Make Your Number

Subscribe to the Sales Force
Effectiveness Blog Via Email.

Your email:


april_webinar_cta

Sales Benchmark Index provides sales consulting services to leading organizations.

These companies are seeking to increase their rate of revenue growth. Unlike traditional sales improvement approaches, such as software implementations or skills training, we offer superior value because we rely on the benchmarking method to deliver results. This method of sales consulting allows for results to be delivered quickly with little organizational disruption. This is accomplished through the use of best-in-class diagnostic tools and solutions that are supported with verifiable proof. Each project is executed by the most experienced team of advisors in the industry.

Sales Force Effectiveness Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Sales Training- Are you neglecting your 'A' players?

  
  
  

Sales Training programs need to focus more attention on training and development of ‘A’ players.  We continue to see too many sales forces trying to solve for under performers. The best sales leaders build their talent management programs around developing future leaders that can grow the organization not just make the number. Let’s see how you are doing.
 Exercise-
a) Write down the number of years you have been in sales management
b) Write down the number of people you have promoted that have had success in the new role. Promotions that result in failure do not count.
c) If the answer to Question A is more than Question B you are a sales manager.
d) If the answer to Question B is more than Question A you are a sales leader.
e) If you want to be a sales leader, stop neglecting your 'A' players. Best in class sales leaders we study promote 1 person per year.

tour-square-button
 
Sales Leaders vs. Sales Managers. And let me preface this: Sales Managers have the best intent; they just need to change their thinking.
1. Sales Managers hire people that can make the number today. Sales Leaders hire people that can make the number today and develop those who can create teams of people that can make the number tomorrow through relentless, on purpose coaching.
2. Sales Managers want their reps to know that they are the boss, and if tested, can sell better than anybody on the team. Sales Leaders focus on surrounding themselves with people that are better than they are.  This requires self-confidence.
3. Sales Managers close deals for their reps and celebrate. As managers, they are worried about their quarterly commission and this is how they keep score.  In doing so they cripple their reps ability to develop. Sales Leaders will let a rep lose a deal and use the opportunity to teach them where in the Sales Process they went wrong.  Watching their team grow new capabilities is how the Sales Leader keeps score.
4. Sales Managers treat everybody the same and spend twice as much time helping ‘C’ players struggle to be C+ players.They view the gap in performance of a ‘C’ player as the problem to solve. Sales Leaders spend twice as much time with an ‘A’ player over a ‘B’ player and almost 3 times as much with an ‘A’ player over a ‘C’ player. They recognize an ‘A’ player deserves a disproportionate amount of their time.
5. Sales Managers have created a culture where time with the boss is perceived as a negative. “oh, no, you have to spend time with the sales manager”.  This can only happen for two reasons:
a. You have a team made up of ‘C’ players.  No ‘A’ player or high potential ‘B’ player I know has ever avoided the opportunity to get better.
b. As a Sales Manager, you are a poor coach and add no value.
Sales Leaders have created a culture where the team is fighting over who gets to spend time with the boss. The Sales Leaders’ team is fanatical about constant improvement and sales training time.
Solution
1. Change how you plan your month
2. Publish a calendar in advance
3. Follow the 80/20 time allocation methodology. 80% of your coaching  should be spent on‘A’ players and ‘B’ players that can become ‘A’ players in 18 months or less.  C’s get the leftovers.
Example
• Assume you have 160 hours in a month (20 working days x 8 hours per day)
• 120 of these hours (75%) should be spent coaching, training and developing your team
• Attending sales calls, 1 on 1 pipeline reviews, classroom training and individual development plans
• 120 x 80% = 96 hours for A’s and B’s.
o 96 hours (12 days) with ‘A’ & ‘B’ players
o 24 hours (3 days) with ‘C’ players
• You now go to your calendar and schedule your time with your ‘A’ and ‘B’ players
• This time can be broken up in half days depending on your sales territory
• Once those days are confirmed, you can fit the ‘C’ player in the remaining time slots; if you run out of days due to meetings, don't neglect the A's. The lowest performer loses their time first.
• You are probably saying “wow, the C players get starved; they may end up leaving”. This is exactly what you want to happen. Allow those ‘C’ players to go be ‘A’ players in something else. Have the courage to do them a favor.


My next post will cover the second part of the solution for those wanting to become sales leaders--what to do when you are with your ‘A’ and ‘B’ players to maximize your sales training opportunity.

 

Comments

How true this is, why waste your time on reps that won't make a difference. This is a very insightful article that will no doubt help my business. How can I get more information Matt Sharrers?
Posted @ Friday, August 05, 2011 11:52 AM by Jim Pisarcik
Thanks for the note Jim and you are right focusing only on those that drive the number; taking a proactive approach to time allocation is great first step.
Posted @ Friday, August 05, 2011 1:10 PM by Matt Sharrers
THIS WILL BE MY FIRST TIME THAT I WILL LIKE TO APPLY YOUR TECHNIQUES. . . AND IF IT WORKS,YOU WILL ENJOY ME BETTER.THANKS
Posted @ Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:42 PM by POPOOLA
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics