Subscribe to the Sales & Marketing
Effectiveness Blog Via Email.

Your email:

Subscribe to Sales Blog via RSS Or Subscribe To The Blog Via RSS

Contact Us

Sales Benchmark Index provides sales & marketing consulting services to leading organizations.

These companies are seeking to increase their rate of revenue growth. Unlike traditional sales improvement approaches, such as software implementations or skills training, we offer superior value because we rely on the benchmarking method to deliver results. This method of sales consulting allows for results to be delivered quickly with little organizational disruption. This is accomplished through the use of best-in-class diagnostic tools and solutions that are supported with verifiable proof. Each project is executed by the most experienced team of advisors in the industry.

Sales & Marketing Effectiveness Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Three Ways Sales Management Can Move ‘C’ Players to ‘A ‘Players

  
  
  

Over 73% of ‘C’ Players never make their quota and 68% ultimately leave the company (usually not voluntary). With those almost insurmountable stats, why should Sales Management even bother working with ‘C’ players? Shouldn’t you spend your time with your ‘A’ players?

Because 15% of them turn out to be your best ‘A’ players. Coaching them is extremely important.

The first step is find out how many ‘C’ Players you have on your team.  And how do you find these ‘diamonds’ in the coal mine that can become ‘A’ Players?

You need assess your team.  Obviously quota attainment is the easiest predictor of grading an ‘A’, ‘B’ or ‘C’ player.  However, there are more important metrics to consider:

  • Call Activity
  • Close Rate
  • Sales Cycle Length
  • Average Sales Price
  • ‘No Decision’ Loss Ratio
  • Selling time allocation

Measurement of these key basic metrics, along with your assessment based on sales competencies, should be your first attempt to assess your team.  For example, if sales approach is a competency used for your sales people; use an approach like the one shown below:

a players sales management

c players sales management

 

By answering a scenario based question or by you observing them in the field, it will allow you both a quantitative and qualitative assessment.  Without this type of analysis, you will let your personal ‘bias’ towards the person play in the decision to devote precious resources (your time) to the ‘C’ player.  You must remove this ‘friendship’ bias when assessing your team.  Loyalty, effort and camaraderie are important.  But how important is it at the expense of lost revenue and your job?

Three ways to move ‘C’ players to ‘A’ players:

  1. Look in the mirror.  Is this person your ‘friend’ and you don’t want to let them go?  Are they a long term employee who you feel loyalty to?  Is he or she a ‘good’ guy?  Over 38% of lost productivity in a sales force are those ‘C’ players who are not effective anymore.  I have resigned from organizations just because of this ‘political’ environment in which executives protect these ‘C’ players.  Resolving this issue in your company is the most important and most difficult in assessing, deciding and working with ‘C’ players.  To net it out, will your boss let you terminate this person?
  2. Get them off the couch.  You must increase their selling time.  What is selling time? Customer or Customer related activity.  Think of going on a sales call vs. doing an expense report. How much time do they actually sell?  World Class ‘A’ player spend over 73% of their time selling. Increase a ‘C’ players call activity.  When their selling time increases, funny things start to happen.  The increased customer interaction means more personal rejection for the sales rep. It means using selling skills.  It means more on the job learning.  And it will quickly help you determine what ‘C’ player is actually worth your time and attention.
  3. Be a jerk.  Yep, lets face it, they should be fighting for their job.  Don’t be mean but hold them accountable for the above metrics.  Not sure of what to do?  Here is a guide:

Metric

Minimum required activity

Call Activity

No less than 5 customer interactions per day

Close Rate

Must be at least 35% (Benchmark numbers have this in the Percentage in the bottom quartile)

Sales Cycle Length

No MORE than 25% above the average for your sales force

Average Sales Price

No LESS than 25% of the sale force average

‘No Decision’ Loss Ratio

No MORE than 25% of the sales force average

Selling Time Allocation

No less than 60% of their time

You must be sure to set these goals and monitor them.  After 3 weeks, you will know if you should work with them on a continued basis or begin the exit strategy, which includes sourcing a new sales rep to fill their role.  The key is consistent upgrading of talent.  It is a process that never ends.

Upgrading ‘C’ players is difficult.  Just ask Paul McDonald.  I hired Paul as a sales manager and placed him in our worst performing district. He had 7 ‘C’ players out of 7 total team members. His team hit only 25% of quota the year before. Their closing rate was the lowest of 175 sales teams.  A week on the job he called me up to resign.  But instead of quitting, Paul made a commitment.  He decided to hold himself and his sales reps accountable to the exact same principles above.  So, a year later Paul’s team was the top performing district in the company.  He fired 2 of the 7 reps, hired 2 ‘A’ players and took the remaining 3 sales reps to Presidents Club.  He coached the ‘C’ players either up or out.  Paul now has left that company for a big VP of Sales promotion.

Do you have ‘C’ players on your team?  Do you want to upgrade your team?  Attend our next webinar and prepare for next year.

 

333b9d69-3036-434d-8669-1f38ccfb1014

 

If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by subscribing by Email or RSS.

Comments

You guys at SBI and we at ESR think so much alike. However we disagree on this one. I recently wrote a post that you can't move a C player to B level, not to mention A.  
 
About Salesreps: Can You Transform a C Player into a B Player? http://ow.ly/6MKOi 
 
I wonder whether you agree with my contention, that it's a matter of definition...
Posted @ Tuesday, October 04, 2011 6:12 AM by Dave Stein
Dave,  
 
 
 
Thanks for the comment. The overall point is to make sure you have identified your 'C' players properly. If they have potential and are willing to work hard and be held accountable, are they really 'C' players to begin with? 
 
Dan
Posted @ Tuesday, October 04, 2011 12:37 PM by Dan Perry
Dan, 
I found this a very interesting article, and I'd like to ask for your permission to translate this blog to spanish and post it in my site, providing full author data (your name and a link back to this original post). 
Can I proceed? 
 
Thanks, 
 
Giovanni 
 
PS. You can check some translated blogs from Anthony Iannarino at http://www.optimizamos.com/blogs/menu-comercial/95-blog-excusas if you want to check how yours would look like.
Posted @ Thursday, October 06, 2011 11:34 AM by Giovanni Pavolini
Giovanni 
 
Sure! Please send me the address as well so we can link to your site for the Spanish translation. 
 
Glad you enjoyed it. 
 
Dan
Posted @ Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:32 PM by Dan Perry
good reading here
Posted @ Monday, December 05, 2011 2:18 PM by Alex Weaver
I am also a sales person of a pharmaceutical company & i don't think that these three points are too much to increase the performance of a sales representative. 
 
The organizational management should give some incentives too hold them if that person is a long term employee of the company...!!!
Posted @ Saturday, December 24, 2011 9:10 AM by zia-ul-Mustafa
Great Article
Posted @ Sunday, April 01, 2012 6:29 AM by Bart
you guys are usually right on with all your blogs (i re-tweet you all the time) but there are too many variables you miss in this one, the most important being a persons aptitude and attitude. Focusing on the metrics is important, but they might be a C player because they are wrong for the position or don't want to do what is needed, which should make the focus on their motivation as well.
Posted @ Sunday, April 15, 2012 3:55 PM by Jonathan London
Really good article...The only point I'd add is to be careful not spending enough time with your "A" players. Your "A" players will tend to have your most important accounts and need your support. Also, I've seen "A" players be virtually ignored (management assuming they didn't need attention or much feedback) and, voila, they'll move on to an organization who will properly stroke their egos and further develop them! I also suggest using your "A" players to coach/mentor the "C" players. 
 
Posted @ Wednesday, June 27, 2012 10:29 AM by Mel "Doc" Croucher
improve botom quintiles working and coaching C players and making them into A players
Posted @ Monday, January 28, 2013 10:16 AM by SA
Dan, 
A very solid article. I agree with the premise of knowing who your A,B, & C players are and on making this determination based on quantitative and qualitative data. This should be a preliminary step in the coaching/development process. Where a Manager allocates coaching/development time is a crucial decision. ROI on the time and effort allocation inherent in coaching/developing reps is a crucial factor in the decision. I recommend a 60/30/10 ratio. 60% allocation to A players, 30% to your B's - allocating the majority of your time to those you can elevate to A status and 10% to your C players - time here is spent on communicating and monitoring compliance to standards and expectations or working them out of the organization. Your A players will give the greatest return on coaching, they are the most fun to work with and the hold most if not all of your key customer relationships so they warrant the majority of a manager's attention. Too often I see managers displaying what I refer to as the Mother Theresa syndrome: trying to save the lost souls and the needy. On sales teams your lost and needy are the C players. Don't be a Mother Theresa! BTW - New players get a separate coaching/development allocation.
Posted @ Wednesday, January 30, 2013 11:48 AM by Todd Trombley
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics