Make Your Number

Subscribe to the Sales Force
Effectiveness Blog Via Email.

Your email:


april_webinar_cta

Sales Benchmark Index provides sales consulting services to leading organizations.

These companies are seeking to increase their rate of revenue growth. Unlike traditional sales improvement approaches, such as software implementations or skills training, we offer superior value because we rely on the benchmarking method to deliver results. This method of sales consulting allows for results to be delivered quickly with little organizational disruption. This is accomplished through the use of best-in-class diagnostic tools and solutions that are supported with verifiable proof. Each project is executed by the most experienced team of advisors in the industry.

Sales Force Effectiveness Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

How the VP of Sales can Inspire their Sales Team with 4 Simple Habits

  
  
  

Talent Management77% of VPs of Sales are attending customer/prospect meetings less than 2 full days per quarter.  Our 2011 sales force design study revealed this alarming statistic.  Think about this:

VP of Sales quarterly work schedule:

  • 600 hours (50 hours per week x 12 weeks  assuming 1 week vacation)
  • 16 hours with customers/prospects (2 full days or 4 half days of appointments)
  • Less than 3% of total time customer facing

Problem:  How can the sales leader make informed, strategic decisions on how to lead the customer facing group (sales) if they are not customer facing themselves? They can’t.  And the sales force will see this. The VP of Sales is always under the watchful eye of the sales force, especially the ‘A’ player sales talent. Regardless of the number of levels in a sales organization, the person at the top sets the drumbeat; or fails to.

Impact: Average tenure of VP of Sales continues to be 6 quarters. What’s worse is this pattern is followed by the CSO’s direct reports so when they are vying for the big job they mirror the boss. Or, when they get it, then they do what their boss did. Most people, regardless of intelligence will often times follow what their most recent boss did when they get promoted.

The reason for this time drain: meetings at corporate.  Any of this sound familiar?

  • Strategy meeting
  • Board meeting
  • Executive meeting
  • Steering committee meeting
  • Cross functional meeting
  • M&A meeting
  • Strategic Initiative Meeting
  • Forecast Meeting
  • Pipeline Meeting
  • Change Mgmt Meeting
  •  Pre meeting for the super duper big meeting.
    • Seriously?  The internal meetings that are inward facing reporting on the news instead of being outward facing making the news are stifling sales productivity.

4 Habits To Fix the Problem

#1 - Control Schedulethe best VPs of Sales we met with set their schedule at the start of the quarter. They do the following:

  • 3 of 4 weeks in the field every month
  • Each week they are in field Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday
  • Other meetings get scheduled around this schedule first. The CEO will be fine with this schedule if he knows the VP is in the field.

#2 - Optimize Field Time—VP of Sales usually have 6-8 regional sales leaders (Directors, Area VPs). The best VPs travel to each direct report once per quarter. During this, they are observing their directs ability to coach and train the field by engaging in the following:

  • 2-3 customer meetings (led by an 'A' player sales rep/account manager)
  • 2-3 prospect meeting (led by an 'A' player sales rep)
  • Meet with the local sales team
  • Lunch/Dinner with the 'A' players
  • Review of Core Sales Management Fundamentals with local Sales Manager

#3 - Publishing Failurethe sales force is dying for an authentic leader. They want to know it is ok to make mistakes. To promote this VP of Sales that drive failure based learning via loss reviews/lessons learned creates more loyalty. They don’t give the corporate spin and promote a culture of self-preservation. Once per quarter, walk through the top 5 losses and lessons learned with the entire sales force in 1 hour via a call. Learning and vulnerability in one call will inspire the team.

#4 - Flip the Pyramid—you work for ‘A’ players not the other way around. Too many sales leaders fall in love with their positional authority. The ‘A’ player is your customer. Without them, you have nothing. Lead with this in mind and consult with them. Get to know them. Ride with them and understand them.

Tim Barber, President of Global Sales at Expeditors International, is the best I have seen. Last week he made over 12 customer and prospect calls. He is the leader of a 6B global sales force. When I ask Tim how he finds time, he gives me a blank stare: “what else am I going to do?” Simple isn’t it?

Call To Action— Pick 2 of the above 4 habits and start next week. Our life’s work is always a result of our habits. What habits have you implemented with your sales talent to inspire them? Share them with us.

If you enjoyed this post, get free updates by subscribing by Email or RSS.

Sign up for our next webinar: Each month a sales consultant from our firm presents a best practice taken from one of our clients.  You can sign up for the next one here:

feb_webinar_cta

Comments

Great blog Matt. The discipline of controlling a schedule is critical, but at times a reall challenge. I also think the job of the authentic leader is to engage and inspire their salesforce. Not sure this always happens, but the investment can pay huge dividends. Thanks for posting this, jg
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 6:39 AM by JKG
Jane, 
 
Thanks for the comments; you are right, engagement is the priority. Often times we see the leader letting other things get in the way of face time with the reps and this shouldnt happen.
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 6:56 AM by matt sharrers
Hmmm.. interesting. Wouldn't the VP Sales learn a lot more about the vulnerabilities of his team if he spent more time with the B/C players and less time with the A players? He probably already understands how winners win in his organization but maybe doesn't understand roadblocks or skill deficiencies of his reps/management team. Just a thought...
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:47 AM by trish bertuzzi
Matts, write up and opinion is on par to my experiences in the past. Being one of those A players, later becoming a sales leader, the habits of my VPoS were mirrored all the way down to the field. When I had the opportunity to speak to our challenges, I knew I was speaking to a leader who "got it" being in the field himself each time he was visiting my market. The conversations and resulting action plan was something that got full engagement from myself and the other leaders around me, since we knew our VPoS had seen it for himself and got us engaged in the strategy to win, swinging another large factor in his favor, emotion! The above guidance isn't easy to do, I've seen other VPoS struggle. Perhaps that is why the tenure of a VPoS is lower then you'd expect. Why not plug in and excute on the SBI info above? Your people will appreciate your effort and surely get engaged in delivering with you. If they don't then you'll quickly realize that you may have the wrong team under you, something that can also be changed for a more successful tenure. 
 
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 11:50 AM by Hussein Nagji
Trish, 
 
Thanks for your comment. As it relates to understanding vulnerabilities, the VP needs to be aware of them all. However, in doing so, there is only so much time. An ROI will be better realized through working with an 'A' than a 'C'. Our best and brightest deserve to be coached
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 11:55 AM by matt sharrers
Appreciate the words Hussein. Our work with organizations continue to show that sales people respond well when they know thier VP is in touch with the market and can still execute some core selling fundamentals. As a VP there is nothing like first hand observation of the team and the market
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:00 PM by matt sharrers
First, thanks for responding to my comment. Second, I apologize for not being clear. I was not suggesting the A players not be coached I was suggesting that spending (some) time out of that inner circle might provide him with visibility into a set of roadblocks and/or challenges that, if addressed, could potentially result in a gain. Just a thought - sorry for not being clear.
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:01 PM by trish bertuzzi
No apology required,Trish. 'B' players are absolutely critical and should be coached. 'C' player coaching time should be minimal. Typically, 'C' players have had numerous chances to improve and time is better spent elsewhere.
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:04 PM by matt sharrers
Usually, I think the SBI blog posts are very insightful and look forward to reading them. There are several great points in the article, but the greatest disappointment is the focus on A players. 
 
 
 
I tend to agree with Trish. The greatest impact, the greatest need, and the greatest ROI is probably with the B players. Most of the data I've seen, as well as my experience both in leading very large sales organizations, and from most of the data I have seen would not support your premise of focusing on A players. (I know SBI likes to refer to SEC data--their data would indicate the greatest ROI in management coaching is with B players). 
 
 
 
Our jobs as sales managers is to drive the highest levels of performance in our organizations. That means we invest where we have the greatest opportunity to improve performance and where we have the greatest performance exposures. 
 
 
 
Perhaps my experience base and data is very different than yours, but I would tend to invest more in B's. I would not ignore A's, nor would I ignore C's.
Posted @ Friday, February 03, 2012 4:26 PM by Dave Brock
Dave, 
 
Thanks for the comments and strong point of view. I should have been clearer in my post that I am speaking about the CSO/VP of Sales. I prefaced in the post that this the area sales manager, sales director lie in between. They are absolutely critical to the development of B players. In fact i wrote a post about B players briding the quota gap in Q4; I agree with you, B's are critical. This post was directed at the third/fourth level sales leader adn how he/she can optimize thier time in the field by seeing what the best players are doing across the country. This can be shared on subsequent visits in other areas. In addition, the 'A' players are left alone too often; they are not coached and pushed. They get taken for granted so if the VP is in town, what a wonderful opportunity to ensure the best and brightest get face time.
Posted @ Friday, February 03, 2012 5:20 PM by matt sharrers
Thanks for tne note Matt. I would still tend to disagree. Where I have seen the top sales executives have the greatest impact in the field is in the problem areas. It is powerful from several points of view: 
 
 
 
1. It's an opportunity to assess the performance of the subordinate managers in addressing the problem areas. It provides the top executive the data and insights they need in coaching the managers and improving their capabilities. 
 
2. It's amazing the impact the top executive can have in focusing on middle and even poorer performers. Too often these people don't see the top executive's perspective--because too many top executives just want to play with top performers. They don't get to understand and internalize what the top executives are trying to achieve until they have seen it up close and personal. 
 
3. The storytelling and sharing of best practices is a critical function of the top executive. But those stories and best practices have the greatest impact when they are being shared with the mid range performers. My personal experience is the changes resulting from windshield time with middle performers in helping them understand why we've chosen the strategies we have, what some of the best practice are and how the sales person can leverage them. 
 
4. The power of the top executive reinforcing and amplifying the coaching these people are receiving from their managers is enormous. 
 
5. Finally, you can't imagine the power you get from the grapevine--great executives leverage that power. Imagine "B" players telling the stories to their colleagues, "I was with Matt and he was really helpful and I learned these things...." Your A players aren't resisting your strategies, it's the B and C players that are resisting/questioning. Go right at them and exploit the grapevine subsequently. I won't go into the stories on this, but I have seen a single call with a B player have a ripple effect that improved "buy in" to a very tough turnaround strategy by over 25%. 
 
 
 
It's good to see top performers, we can't ignore them. but surely there are better methods for collecting stories and best practices than by having the top executive have cumbaya sessions with the top performers. 
 
 
 
I think we make this way too complicated. Just as we tell sales people "go where the money is," since managers are accountable for maximizing sales performance, I think the maxim is "go where the problems are (or will be)." That's where we have greatest impact. 
 
 
 
Sorry to continue to disagree--but that's what causes all of us to learn. 
 
 
 
The areas where we are in violent agreement is top execs need to be in the field, and their job is to serve (and protect) their people. 
 
 
 
Thanks for your patience with my diatribe.
Posted @ Friday, February 03, 2012 5:44 PM by Dave Brock
Loving this conversation - so interesting! I decided to "take it to the street" and created a poll in the Linking Sales Leaders group on Linkedin. Here is how I phrased the question... 
 
Should a CSO/VP Sales spend coaching time with A, B or C players? Where do you get the most bang for your coaching buck? 
 
Will be interesting to view the responses. Once again - great conversation here - thank you!
Posted @ Saturday, February 04, 2012 11:07 AM by trish bertuzzi
This is a great post and a great reminder of how crucial it is for VP Sales to be in the Field more often. I've seen many of WW VP Sales lately becoming "expensive admin's" - doing spreadsheets, powerpoints and reports non-stop for Corporate HQ and CEO/CFO. What a waste of talent ! Thanks for the post ! Regards
Posted @ Saturday, February 04, 2012 7:21 PM by SalesAdvisorAsia
Trish, that *should* be interesting. Hope you'll let us (or me) know what happens.  
 
Dave Brock did a similar thing on Focus, and I piped in there, since Dave and I were already debating on his blog about it as well.  
 
Focus thread: http://www.focus.com/questions/how-should-senior-executives-be-spending-their-time-where
Posted @ Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:35 PM by Mike Kunkle
Yes Mike I think it *should*. Right now the data sits has 57% saying the focus should be on B players and 42% saying the focus should be on A players. Small sample size and not a lot of spread so still very interesting... I really have to think this one through a bit more. But then again, don't we all?
Posted @ Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:42 PM by trish bertuzzi
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics