Subscribe to the Sales & Marketing
Effectiveness Blog Via Email.

Your email:

Subscribe to Sales Blog via RSS Or Subscribe To The Blog Via RSS

Contact Us

Sales Benchmark Index provides sales & marketing consulting services to leading organizations.

These companies are seeking to increase their rate of revenue growth. Unlike traditional sales improvement approaches, such as software implementations or skills training, we offer superior value because we rely on the benchmarking method to deliver results. This method of sales consulting allows for results to be delivered quickly with little organizational disruption. This is accomplished through the use of best-in-class diagnostic tools and solutions that are supported with verifiable proof. Each project is executed by the most experienced team of advisors in the industry.

Sales & Marketing Effectiveness Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Channel Lead Management “I Give Them A Ton and They Blow It!”

  
  
  

“Most of the leads that come from corporate are no good.” One channel partner told me, “Very few actually purchase.”

Channel Partner Lead Evolution“What type of leads are the best for you?” I asked.

“Generally, the only deals I close are ones where there is a matter of urgency—their current system is broken or they have a mandate from above to have a system in place within a specific timeline.  I need the customer to say, ‘We need to get this system in place ASAP.” 

Wow I thought, this guy practically needs the customer to have the checkbook out when he calls him.

This Channel Partner is not alone. In a recent Poll of Channel Partners, 68% rated the quality of leads they received from the vendor as “Below Average” or “Poor”. 

Why?

Our research at Sales Benchmark Index found the two biggest culprits.

1.       The leads given to channel partners are often unfiltered inquiries from a website, webinar, or trade show. I’ve seen leads blindly passed along to Channel Partners with invalid phone numbers, students who were merely researching the project, and even a few “Mickey Mouse” inquiries.  Eventually, your Channel Partners will dedicate minimal effort to pre-call planning or stop following up on the leads altogether.  Without a vested effort in converting a lead to an Opportunity, it will simply stay a lead.

2.       Channel Partners do not have the resources to adequately nurture leads early in the sales process.  Many channel partners can only pay sales reps to pursue active opportunities.  In this economic environment, businesses are kept lean to maximize short term revenues and, more importantly, control costs.  They do not have the capital to invest turning “Tire-Kickers” into buyers.  Our friend from above may be an extreme example, but Channel Partners think a Lead should be ready to engage in the Sales Process when they are received.

How are you currently screening and filtering your leads?  Do you have dedicated Lead Development Reps to qualify the prospects? Once qualified, are they thrown over a fence to your channel partners, or do you seek feedback?

World Class Organizations turn leads over to their Channel Partners who are ready to enter the sales cycle (not necessarily purchase your product).  They have qualified them using BANT (Budget, Needs, Timing, and Authority), evaluated them for fit (does the project fit the channel partner’s expertise/scale), and in the best cases, set up a transition to introduce the Lead to the Channel Partner.  After they turn the lead over, they seek feedback from the Channel Partner on fit and readiness to ensure their leads are well qualified.   Every organization should have a sample template of questions to qualify customers- How much of a lift would this be to do it for a Channel Partner? 

Download this BANT Criteria Guide to show how World Class firms qualify their leads before turning them over to the Channel Partner.

download-the-lead-generation-bant-qualif

Are you doing this?  Think of the impact from a well-managed Channel Lead Program.  By saving them the cost of following on baloney leads, you’ll give them more time to spend working with higher quality prospects and ultimately win more business.  

Channel Managers, how are you screening leads for your prospects?  How have you increased the quality of leads and how has impacted your business?  Please post in the comments below.

If you enjoyed this post, never miss one again by subscribing your Email Here and/or subscribing to the RSS Here.

Comments

One tweak to your definition of BANT. Timing refers to the decision timeframe falling within the sales rep's commission earning window.  
 
See: What's a qualified lead? 
Posted @ Monday, June 04, 2012 9:27 AM by John Fox
John, 
It's great to hear from my old hometown of Naperville, and you make an interesting point. 
But what if the lead's timeframe falls outside of the current commission window? What if the commission window is the next two weeks? I would argue that lead nurturing, both automated and through a Lead Development Representative, should be based on the average sales cycle length. For instance, if a customer's timeline is more than two average sales cycle lengths away, continue to nurture them. Within two average sales cycles, assign a sales representative.
Posted @ Monday, June 04, 2012 10:37 AM by Drew Zarges
The guy who created BANT is John Coe, a friend of mine, and had said numerous times that the "T" part of BANT (i.e., Timeline) is the most often confused element. The way I expressed it is John's original intention.  
 
The reason for this, esp. with channel partners, is one of attention. If the rep is primarily compensated on near-term deals, which MOST are (stupid as it sounds, it's reality), you will never get the sales rep's attention no matter how sweet the deal may ultimately be.  
 
It's one of the reasons why reps complain of junk leads...even it they're not.
Posted @ Monday, June 04, 2012 11:49 AM by John Fox
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics